Sadie Skin

Summary:

Consumers don't just buy skincare anymore, they buy routines, personalities and experiences.

For Sadie Skin, I wanted to build a brand that could comfortably live on a Sephora shelf, in an Instagram carousel, inside a PR box, or in someone's TikTok morning routine.

The result is a flexible brand system built around colour-coded categories, distinctive packaging architecture, seasonal campaigns and a visual language that can easily scale as new products are introduced.

Rather than designing one beautiful pack, the focus was creating a system that could grow with the brand.

Challenge:

Making skincare feel distinctive without losing trust.

Skincare is one of the most visually crowded categories. Botanical brands often lean into muted greens and natural textures, while clinical skincare relies heavily on white space, blue tones and scientific cues. The result? Many products start to look interchangeable.

For this conceptual exploration, I wanted to solve a different problem:

How can a skincare brand feel botanical, premium and credible while still having enough personality to be recognised from across a shelf?

The challenge was also bigger than one product. The identity needed to work across different skincare SKUs, product benefits and packaging formats, while leaving room for an unexpected extension into edible skincare.

So the system had to do three things:

• Build recognition across the entire range.

• Help shoppers navigate different products quickly.

• Create enough visual equity for the brand to eventually compete alongside established skincare players.

The answer wasn't another beautiful individual pack.

It was a packaging system designed to work as a family.

Solution:

Designing a system where every choice has a job.

I approached Sadie Skin as a packaging-first brand system, rather than designing each product in isolation.

The thinking started with one question:

What should someone recognise first, understand second, and remember third?

1 - Build a recognisable colour language

Instead of assigning random colours to different products, I used colour as a navigation and psychology tool.

• Deep green → botanical, grounded, natural

• Warm brown → richness, nourishment and indulgence

• Blue → clarity, efficacy and a more clinical confidence

• Soft cream → gentleness, warmth and skin-friendly simplicity

• Yellow → optimism and a more playful, sensorial expression

This creates differentiation between SKUs, while keeping the overall range connected.

The result is a shelf where the colours can work individually and collectively create a recognisable Sadie Skin block.

2 - Pair editorial typography with a clean information system

The typography was intentionally designed to sit between beauty/editorial and modern skincare.

The expressive serif-led Sadie Skin wordmark gives the brand personality and a more premium, established feel. A cleaner supporting typeface handles product names and information, keeping the packaging easy to scan.

This creates a useful tension:

personality + clarity.

The brand doesn't need oversized graphics or excessive information to communicate premium value. The typography does much of that work.

3 - Give every SKU the same visual logic

The layouts follow a consistent hierarchy:

Brand → Product → Benefit → Supporting information

The same structure is carried across cartons, jars, tubes and bottles, so a new product can enter the range without looking like it belongs to a different brand.

Ingredient and texture imagery are used selectively to bring the botanical and sensorial side of skincare into the system, rather than relying on generic lifestyle imagery.

The circular and colour-blocked elements act as recurring visual cues, creating another layer of recognition across the range.

This is where the packaging becomes scalable: the system stays consistent even when the product changes.

4 - Extend the identity beyond traditional skincare

The biggest test of the system was taking Sadie Skin into edible skincare.

Gummies could easily have looked like a completely separate supplement brand. Instead, the same colour architecture, typography, product hierarchy and visual language were carried into pouches, individual sachets and limited-edition formats.

For the packaging materials, I explored metallic pouches for the main gummy range to give the product a more contemporary, premium shelf presence, with gloss-finished individual sachets for a more playful, tactile experience.

A limited-edition Dew Gummies cream-jar format pushes the idea even further deliberately blurring the visual relationship between topical skincare and ingestible beauty.

The goal was simple:

The product can change. The category can expand. The brand should still feel unmistakably Sadie Skin.

WHY THIS SYSTEM WORKS

Rather than designing packaging that simply looks good, the system was built to answer practical brand questions:

1. Can a customer recognise the brand quickly?

Yes - through the typography, colour architecture and recurring graphic cues.

2. Can they tell products apart?

Yes - each SKU has its own colour and imagery while following the same hierarchy.

3. Can the range grow?

Yes - the visual rules can be applied to new products and formats.

4. Can it compete visually with established skincare brands?

The intention was to give Sadie Skin its own territory rather than mimic the dominant clinical or botanical aesthetics already common in the global market.

5. And can the identity stretch beyond skincare?

That was tested through the edible skincare extension proving the system has enough flexibility to evolve without losing recognition.

The result is not just a collection of packs.

It is a packaging system designed to make the brand recognisable, expandable and easier to choose.

Featured on WORLD BRAND DESIGN SOCIETY and PACKAGING OF THE WORLD